D40, 60mm f/2.8 AF-S.
Monday, February 28, 2011
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
Monday, February 21, 2011
Sunday, February 20, 2011
Saturday, February 19, 2011
Friday, February 18, 2011
Thursday, February 17, 2011
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Tuesday, February 15, 2011
Monday, February 14, 2011
Sunday, February 13, 2011
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
Monday, February 7, 2011
7
One more...Light was less nice I guess.
D40, 200mm f/4 micro.
For comparison:
Lens Baby with 1.4x (approx. 75mm)
105mm f/2.8
D40, 200mm f/4 micro.
For comparison:
Lens Baby with 1.4x (approx. 75mm)
105mm f/2.8
Sunday, February 6, 2011
6
I really need to get out and shoot new things, I know. There just hasn't been much within walking distance that catches my fancy...
Again, 200mm f/4 gets me a bit closer.
I am not sure if it is good that I am so consistent in my framing and angle or not.
For comparison:
Lens Baby (approx 50mm)
55mm f/2.8
105mm?
135mm f/2.8
Again, 200mm f/4 gets me a bit closer.
I am not sure if it is good that I am so consistent in my framing and angle or not.
For comparison:
Lens Baby (approx 50mm)
55mm f/2.8
105mm?
135mm f/2.8
Saturday, February 5, 2011
5
Justice. I know I've shot these plenty before, but this is with the 200mm f/4, so the perspective is a little better - I could stand on the steps and be even with the monument without overly loose framing.
For comparison:
135mm f/2.8 before they fixed the missing parts:
I should try this frame filling shot with the 200mm...
55mm?
For comparison:
135mm f/2.8 before they fixed the missing parts:
I should try this frame filling shot with the 200mm...
55mm?
Friday, February 4, 2011
Thursday, February 3, 2011
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)